Mazda CX-60 3.3 D
Suv · Diesel
vs
Toyota Land Cruiser Prado
Suv · Diesel
Mazda CX-60 3.3 D
Car A
Mazda CX-60 3.3 D
The Mazda CX-60 3.3 D balances torque-rich performance, family-ready space, and a 5-star safety rating while staying efficient for its class. It’s a good value in its segment if you prioritize economy and practicality over outright speed.
5 seatsSuvDiesel5-star safety6.1 L/100km272 hp
Toyota Land Cruiser Prado
Car B
Toyota Land Cruiser Prado
A 5-seat diesel with strong torque and a 640-liter cargo area, the Toyota Land Cruiser Prado suits growing families and road trips. It leans toward reliability and safety rather than city agility or performance thrills.
5 seatsSuvDiesel5-star safety
Why compared same body typesame powertrainsame seatssame usage profilesimilar pricestrong usage match

Usage fit

Family 66 / 80
City 48 / 31
Budget / value 43 / 56
Road trip 57 / 72
Performance 33 / 28
Cargo 40 / 44
Practical 44 / 58
Premium 30 / 36
Winter 36 / 40

Scores out of 100. Blue = Mazda CX-60 3.3 D · Orange = Toyota Land Cruiser Prado

Specs side-by-side

Spec Mazda CX-60 3.3 D Toyota Land Cruiser Prado
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Mazda CX-60 3.3 D

  • Efficient for its class at 6.1 L/100km
  • Strong 600 Nm torque and 272 hp for confident passing
  • 570 L cargo space suits growing families and road trips
  • 5-star safety rating

Toyota Land Cruiser Prado

  • 640-liter cargo space handles family gear and luggage.
  • 500 Nm diesel torque makes loaded cruising easy.
  • 8.5 l/100 km combined is efficient for its class.
  • Prioritizes reliability and safety per its positioning.

Verdict

Pick Mazda CX-60 3.3 D if…
Best fuel economy
Mazda CX-60 3.3 D uses 6.1 L/100km vs 8.5 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Toyota Land Cruiser Prado if…
Performance & capability
Toyota Land Cruiser Prado is the choice if you want more power, speed, or all-weather capability.

Related comparisons