Mercedes-Benz GLC 220d
Suv · Diesel
vs
Toyota Land Cruiser Prado
Suv · Diesel
Mercedes-Benz GLC 220d
Car A
Mercedes-Benz GLC 220d
The Mercedes-Benz GLC 220d balances family practicality with long-distance efficiency, pairing 5.9 L/100km consumption with a 550 L trunk. Best for growing families and road trips with strong safety signals, while outright performance and winter prowess are not its focus.
5 seatsSuvDiesel5-star safety5.9 L/100km
Toyota Land Cruiser Prado
Car B
Toyota Land Cruiser Prado
A 5-seat diesel with strong torque and a 640-liter cargo area, the Toyota Land Cruiser Prado suits growing families and road trips. It leans toward reliability and safety rather than city agility or performance thrills.
5 seatsSuvDiesel5-star safety200 hp
Why compared cross brandsame body typesame powertrainsame seatssame usage profilesimilar price

Usage fit

Family 75 / 80
City 47 / 31
Budget / value 57 / 56
Road trip 57 / 72
Performance 28 / 28
Cargo 38 / 44
Practical 57 / 58
Premium 50 / 36
Winter 36 / 40

Scores out of 100. Blue = Mercedes-Benz GLC 220d · Orange = Toyota Land Cruiser Prado

Specs side-by-side

Spec Mercedes-Benz GLC 220d Toyota Land Cruiser Prado
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Mercedes-Benz GLC 220d

  • Efficient for its class at 5.9 L/100km, easing fuel stops on long trips
  • 550 L trunk and 5 seats suit everyday family duties and luggage
  • Safety ranks highly among its strengths in our signals
  • 400 Nm torque and 194 hp enable relaxed highway cruising and confident overtakes

Toyota Land Cruiser Prado

  • 640-liter cargo space handles family gear and luggage.
  • 500 Nm diesel torque makes loaded cruising easy.
  • 8.5 l/100 km combined is efficient for its class.
  • Prioritizes reliability and safety per its positioning.

Verdict

Pick Mercedes-Benz GLC 220d if…
Best fuel economy
Mercedes-Benz GLC 220d uses 5.9 L/100km vs 8.5 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Toyota Land Cruiser Prado if…
More power
Toyota Land Cruiser Prado puts out 200 hp vs 194 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons