Toyota C-HR
Crossover · Hybrid
vs
Mazda CX-5 2.0L
Crossover · Gasoline
Toyota C-HR
Car A
Toyota C-HR
The Toyota C-HR leans on hybrid efficiency, reliability, and safety to serve city and small-family needs. It’s good value around 24,000, but performance and premium appeal are not its focus.
5 seatsCrossoverHybrid5-star safety5.8 L/100kmHybrid
Mazda CX-5 2.0L
Car B
Mazda CX-5 2.0L
A well-rounded family SUV that emphasizes reliability and safety while staying efficient for its class. Offers good value in its segment with usable performance and a practical 506 L trunk.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety165 hp
Why compared more reliablecomparison picksame body typesame seatssimilar pricestep-up price

Usage fit

Family 69 / 73
City 69 / 55
Budget / value 72 / 70
Road trip 37 / 54
Performance 24 / 26
Cargo 27 / 35
Practical 54 / 56
Premium 15 / 23
Winter 28 / 34

Scores out of 100. Blue = Toyota C-HR · Orange = Mazda CX-5 2.0L

Specs side-by-side

Spec Toyota C-HR Mazda CX-5 2.0L
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Toyota C-HR

  • Efficient for its class at 5.8 L/100 km combined
  • Good value in its segment around 24,000
  • Reliability-led positioning for lower ownership stress
  • City-friendly with 5 seats and a 377 L trunk for daily duties

Mazda CX-5 2.0L

  • High reliability score (85) with 5-star safety
  • Efficient for its class at 6.9 L/100 km
  • Good value in its segment around 26,000
  • Practical 506 L trunk and 5-seat layout for growing families

Verdict

Pick Toyota C-HR if…
Best fuel economy
Toyota C-HR uses 5.8 L/100km vs 6.9 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Mazda CX-5 2.0L if…
Reliability edge
Mazda CX-5 2.0L scores higher on reliability — worth considering for long-term ownership.

Related comparisons