Kia Stonic 1.0 T-GDi ISG 120 Mild Hybrid
Crossover · Mild_hybrid
vs
Toyota C-HR
Crossover · Hybrid
Kia Stonic 1.0 T-GDi ISG 120 Mild Hybrid
Car A
Kia Stonic 1.0 T-GDi ISG 120 Mild Hybrid
A city-friendly small-family choice that balances low running costs with usable performance. It’s good value in its segment if you prioritize efficiency and everyday practicality over outright speed or cargo space.
5 seatsCrossoverMild_hybrid5-star safety5.2 L/100km120 hpHybrid
Toyota C-HR
Car B
Toyota C-HR
The Toyota C-HR leans on hybrid efficiency, reliability, and safety to serve city and small-family needs. It’s good value around 24,000, but performance and premium appeal are not its focus.
5 seatsCrossoverHybrid5-star safetyHybrid
Why compared cross brandsame body typesame powertrainsame seatssimilar price

Usage fit

Family 65 / 69
City 70 / 69
Budget / value 70 / 72
Road trip 39 / 37
Performance 28 / 24
Cargo 26 / 27
Practical 51 / 54
Premium 15 / 15
Winter 28 / 28

Scores out of 100. Blue = Kia Stonic 1.0 T-GDi ISG 120 Mild Hybrid · Orange = Toyota C-HR

Specs side-by-side

Spec Kia Stonic 1.0 T-GDi ISG 120 Mild Hybrid Toyota C-HR
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Kia Stonic 1.0 T-GDi ISG 120 Mild Hybrid

  • Low fuel use (5.2 L/100 km) suits city commuting
  • Adequate pace for daily driving: 120 hp, 0–100 km/h in 9.9 s
  • Practical for a small family with 5 seats and a 352 L boot
  • Price of 21,500 offers good value in its segment

Toyota C-HR

  • Efficient for its class at 5.8 L/100 km combined
  • Good value in its segment around 24,000
  • Reliability-led positioning for lower ownership stress
  • City-friendly with 5 seats and a 377 L trunk for daily duties

Verdict

Pick Kia Stonic 1.0 T-GDi ISG 120 Mild Hybrid if…
Best fuel economy
Kia Stonic 1.0 T-GDi ISG 120 Mild Hybrid uses 5.2 L/100km vs 5.8 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Toyota C-HR if…
Performance & capability
Toyota C-HR is the choice if you want more power, speed, or all-weather capability.

Related comparisons