Toyota C-HR
Crossover · Hybrid
vs
Mazda CX-30
Crossover · Gasoline
Toyota C-HR
Car A
Toyota C-HR
The Toyota C-HR leans on hybrid efficiency, reliability, and safety to serve city and small-family needs. It’s good value around 24,000, but performance and premium appeal are not its focus.
5 seatsCrossoverHybrid5-star safety5.8 L/100kmHybrid
Mazda CX-30
Car B
Mazda CX-30
The Mazda CX-30 delivers good value in its segment by balancing efficiency, usable performance, and top safety. It suits compact-family and city use, backed by a reliability score of 85 and five safety stars.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety186 hp
Why compared more reliablebetter valuecomparison picksame body typesame seatssimilar price

Usage fit

Family 69 / 71
City 69 / 56
Budget / value 72 / 72
Road trip 37 / 50
Performance 24 / 28
Cargo 27 / 31
Practical 54 / 54
Premium 15 / 22
Winter 28 / 34

Scores out of 100. Blue = Toyota C-HR · Orange = Mazda CX-30

Specs side-by-side

Spec Toyota C-HR Mazda CX-30
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Toyota C-HR

  • Efficient for its class at 5.8 L/100 km combined
  • Good value in its segment around 24,000
  • Reliability-led positioning for lower ownership stress
  • City-friendly with 5 seats and a 377 L trunk for daily duties

Mazda CX-30

  • Five-star safety and an 85 reliability score for peace of mind
  • Efficient for its class at 6.5 combined consumption
  • Lively daily performance: 186 hp and 0–100 km/h in 8.5 s
  • Practical compact-family fit with 430 L trunk and 5 seats

Verdict

Pick Toyota C-HR if…
Best fuel economy
Toyota C-HR uses 5.8 L/100km vs 6.5 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Mazda CX-30 if…
Reliability edge
Mazda CX-30 scores higher on reliability — worth considering for long-term ownership.

Related comparisons