Toyota C-HR
Crossover · Hybrid
vs
Mazda CX-3 Touring
Crossover · Gasoline
Toyota C-HR
Car A
Toyota C-HR
The Toyota C-HR leans on hybrid efficiency, reliability, and safety to serve city and small-family needs. It’s good value around 24,000, but performance and premium appeal are not its focus.
5 seatsCrossoverHybrid5-star safety5.8 L/100kmHybrid
Mazda CX-3 Touring
Car B
Mazda CX-3 Touring
The Mazda CX-3 Touring offers good value in its segment for city driving, combining a 5-star safety rating and an 85 reliability score with efficient 6.1 combined consumption. Its 264 L trunk and 150 hp are modest, making it less ideal for cargo-heavy use or performance-focused buyers.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety150 hp
Why compared more reliablebetter valuecomparison picksame body typesame seatssame usage profile

Usage fit

Family 69 / 65
City 69 / 69
Budget / value 72 / 73
Road trip 37 / 36
Performance 24 / 24
Cargo 27 / 21
Practical 54 / 51
Premium 15 / 16
Winter 28 / 28

Scores out of 100. Blue = Toyota C-HR · Orange = Mazda CX-3 Touring

Specs side-by-side

Spec Toyota C-HR Mazda CX-3 Touring
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Toyota C-HR

  • Efficient for its class at 5.8 L/100 km combined
  • Good value in its segment around 24,000
  • Reliability-led positioning for lower ownership stress
  • City-friendly with 5 seats and a 377 L trunk for daily duties

Mazda CX-3 Touring

  • 5-star safety rating
  • Reliability score of 85
  • Efficient for its class (6.1 combined consumption)
  • Good value in its segment at a listed price of 22000

Verdict

Pick Toyota C-HR if…
Best fuel economy
Toyota C-HR uses 5.8 L/100km vs 6.1 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Mazda CX-3 Touring if…
Reliability edge
Mazda CX-3 Touring scores higher on reliability — worth considering for long-term ownership.

Related comparisons