Toyota Avalon
Sedan · Gasoline · FWD
vs
Subaru Impreza Sedan
Sedan · Gasoline · AWD
Toyota Avalon
Car A
Toyota Avalon
With five seats, a 497 L trunk, and a strong focus on reliability and safety, the Toyota Avalon fits growing families and road trips. Its 301 hp performance and good value in its segment appeal, though higher fuel use, FWD traction, and limited cargo flexibility may deter some.
5 seatsSedanGasoline5-star safety
Subaru Impreza Sedan
Car B
Subaru Impreza Sedan
The Subaru Impreza Sedan blends all-wheel-drive confidence with efficiency for its class, making it a steady choice for road trips and everyday family needs. Strong safety and reliability scores bolster its appeal, though it’s not aimed at enthusiasts.
5 seatsSedanGasoline5-star safety6.7 L/100kmAWD
Why compared more reliablecomparison picksame body typesame powertrain

Usage fit

Family 64 / 41
City 34 / 26
Budget / value 59 / 19
Road trip 63 / 47
Performance 35 / 10
Cargo 27 / 0
Practical 42 / 23
Premium 34 / 18
Winter 30 / 66

Scores out of 100. Blue = Toyota Avalon · Orange = Subaru Impreza Sedan

Specs side-by-side

Spec Toyota Avalon Subaru Impreza Sedan
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Toyota Avalon

  • Strong reliability and safety focus for low-stress ownership
  • Room for five and a 497 L trunk works for family duties and road trips
  • 301 hp and 7.2 s 0-100 km/h enable confident passing and merging
  • Around $36,000 pricing offers good value in its segment

Subaru Impreza Sedan

  • AWD traction adds stability in mixed weather and on long trips
  • 5-star safety rating supports family-focused peace of mind
  • Reliability score of 85 favors low-drama ownership
  • Combined consumption of 6.7 L/100 km is efficient for its class

Verdict

Pick Toyota Avalon if…
Efficiency & everyday ease
Toyota Avalon is the choice if fuel economy and city-friendly driving are your priority.
Pick Subaru Impreza Sedan if…
Reliability edge
Subaru Impreza Sedan scores higher on reliability — worth considering for long-term ownership.

Related comparisons