Skoda Kodiaq L&K vs Toyota Land Cruiser 80

Skoda Kodiaq L&K

Suv · Gasoline

Toyota Land Cruiser 80

Suv · Gasoline

Car A

Skoda Kodiaq L&K

The Skoda Kodiaq L&K is a seven-seat petrol model tailored to large families and road trips, pairing a huge 835 L boot with a capable 245 hp drivetrain. It emphasizes reliability, safety, and practicality over sporty dynamics or city agility.

7 seatsSuvGasoline5-star safety8 L/100km245 hp

Car B

Toyota Land Cruiser 80

With eight seats, a 680 L trunk, and strong reliability signals, the Land Cruiser 80 suits large families and long trips. The V8 brings easygoing pace, but efficiency and city driving are not its strengths.

8 seatsSuvGasoline3-star safety

Why compared more reliablebetter valuecomparison pickalternative pickcross brandsame body type

Usage fit

Family 93 / 76

City 32 / 23

Budget / value 57 / 50

Road trip 70 / 64

Performance 30 / 26

Cargo 60 / 53

Practical 66 / 57

Premium 35 / 29

Winter 40 / 32

Scores out of 100. Blue = Skoda Kodiaq L&K · Orange = Toyota Land Cruiser 80

Specs side-by-side

Spec Skoda Kodiaq L&K Toyota Land Cruiser 80

Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Skoda Kodiaq L&K

Seven seats and an 835 L boot suit large-family duties and holiday packing
245 hp and 370 Nm provide easy highway overtakes and relaxed cruising
Around 8 L/100 km combined is efficient for its class among seven-seat petrol models
Prioritizes reliability and safety, matching family-focused buyers
Petrol-only; those seeking hybrid-level city efficiency may be disappointed
Not tuned for performance driving despite a 7.8 s 0–100 km/h time
Less convenient for tight urban parking and stop‑start traffic than smaller cars
At about 45,000, the top-end pricing may exceed some family budgets

Toyota Land Cruiser 80

Seats for eight suit large families
680 L trunk handles family luggage and gear
Strong reliability ranking
V8 torque and 0–100 km/h in 8 s ease highway travel
Combined consumption of 13.5 L/100 km is thirsty
Weak in city driving and tight stop‑start use
Not aimed at performance driving
Price of 45,000 may stretch some budgets

Verdict

Pick Skoda Kodiaq L&K if…

Best fuel economy

Skoda Kodiaq L&K uses 8.0 L/100km vs 13.5 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.

Pick Toyota Land Cruiser 80 if…

Reliability edge

Toyota Land Cruiser 80 scores higher on reliability — worth considering for long-term ownership.

Usage fit

Specs side-by-side

Pros & cons

Skoda Kodiaq L&amp;K

Toyota Land Cruiser 80

Verdict

Related comparisons

Skoda Kodiaq L&K