Skoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI
Suv · Gasoline
vs
Toyota Land Cruiser 80
Suv · Gasoline
Skoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI
Car A
Skoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI
With seven seats, an 835 L boot, and 6.4 L/100 km combined consumption, the Skoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI is a practical, efficient choice for large families and road trips. It prioritizes space and sensible running costs over premium flash or outright performance.
7 seatsSuvGasoline5-star safety6.4 L/100km
Toyota Land Cruiser 80
Car B
Toyota Land Cruiser 80
With eight seats, a 680 L trunk, and strong reliability signals, the Land Cruiser 80 suits large families and long trips. The V8 brings easygoing pace, but efficiency and city driving are not its strengths.
8 seatsSuvGasoline3-star safety204 hp
Why compared cross brandsame body typesame powertrain

Usage fit

Family 83 / 76
City 37 / 23
Budget / value 49 / 50
Road trip 70 / 64
Performance 26 / 26
Cargo 60 / 53
Practical 54 / 57
Premium 30 / 29
Winter 40 / 32

Scores out of 100. Blue = Skoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI · Orange = Toyota Land Cruiser 80

Specs side-by-side

Spec Skoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI Toyota Land Cruiser 80
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Skoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI

  • Seven-seat flexibility and an 835 L boot suit large families and cargo-heavy trips.
  • Efficient for its class at 6.4 L/100 km, helping keep running costs in check.
  • Adequate acceleration (0–100 km/h in 8.4 s) and 250 Nm torque make daily driving easy.
  • Priced around 33,000, offering good value in its segment.

Toyota Land Cruiser 80

  • Seats for eight suit large families
  • 680 L trunk handles family luggage and gear
  • Strong reliability ranking
  • V8 torque and 0–100 km/h in 8 s ease highway travel

Verdict

Pick Skoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI if…
Best fuel economy
Skoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI uses 6.4 L/100km vs 13.5 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Toyota Land Cruiser 80 if…
More power
Toyota Land Cruiser 80 puts out 204 hp vs 150 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons