Mercedes-Benz GLC 300
Suv · Gasoline
vs
Toyota Land Cruiser FJ
Suv · Gasoline
Mercedes-Benz GLC 300
Car A
Mercedes-Benz GLC 300
The Mercedes-Benz GLC 300 blends brisk performance with practical space, suiting growing families and long trips. It emphasizes reliability and safety while offering good value in its segment.
5 seatsSuvGasoline5-star safety8.9 L/100km
Toyota Land Cruiser FJ
Car B
Toyota Land Cruiser FJ
The Toyota Land Cruiser FJ suits growing families and road trips with five seats and a generous 690 L cargo area. Strong gasoline power and a focus on reliability and safety offset a high price and 12 L/100 km fuel use.
5 seatsSuvGasoline5-star safety302 hp
Why compared same body typesame powertrainsame ranking profilesame seatsstrong ranking match

Usage fit

Family 75 / 81
City 43 / 19
Budget / value 57 / 34
Road trip 57 / 72
Performance 29 / 32
Cargo 38 / 46
Practical 54 / 55
Premium 49 / 47
Winter 36 / 40

Scores out of 100. Blue = Mercedes-Benz GLC 300 · Orange = Toyota Land Cruiser FJ

Specs side-by-side

Spec Mercedes-Benz GLC 300 Toyota Land Cruiser FJ
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Mercedes-Benz GLC 300

  • Family-ready 5-seat layout and a generous 550 L trunk for gear and luggage
  • Quick 0–100 km/h in 5.9 s for confident merging and overtakes
  • Signals prioritize reliability and safety for long-term peace of mind
  • At 43,900, it represents good value in its segment

Toyota Land Cruiser FJ

  • Large 690 L cargo space fits family gear for road trips
  • 302 hp and 381 Nm with 0–100 km/h in 8 s aid confident merging and passing
  • Seats five, aligning with needs of growing families
  • Emphasis on reliability and safety rather than outright speed

Verdict

Pick Mercedes-Benz GLC 300 if…
Best fuel economy
Mercedes-Benz GLC 300 uses 8.9 L/100km vs 12.0 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Toyota Land Cruiser FJ if…
More power
Toyota Land Cruiser FJ puts out 302 hp vs 258 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons