Mercedes-Benz E 300
Suv · Gasoline
vs
Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro
Suv · Gasoline
Mercedes-Benz E 300
Car A
Mercedes-Benz E 300
The Mercedes-Benz E 300 suits growing families and road trips, pairing a reliability and safety focus with brisk petrol performance. Five seats and a 540 L trunk add usability, while urban efficiency and price may be sticking points.
5 seatsSuvGasoline5-star safety8.7 L/100km
Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro
Car B
Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro
The Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro leans into reliability and space, making it well suited to growing families and road trips. Strong cargo capacity and a steady V6 outshine its thirst and limited appeal for city or performance driving.
5 seatsSuvGasoline5-star safety270 hp
Why compared more reliablebetter valuecomparison pickcross brandsame body typesame powertrain

Usage fit

Family 75 / 88
City 29 / 24
Budget / value 50 / 50
Road trip 65 / 78
Performance 28 / 27
Cargo 38 / 70
Practical 54 / 59
Premium 59 / 37
Winter 40 / 40

Scores out of 100. Blue = Mercedes-Benz E 300 · Orange = Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro

Specs side-by-side

Spec Mercedes-Benz E 300 Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Mercedes-Benz E 300

  • Reliability and safety are key strengths in this model’s profile.
  • Five seats and a 540 L trunk support family duties and longer journeys.
  • 0–100 km/h in 5.7 s for confident highway merging and overtakes.
  • Good value in its segment for a premium petrol car with this level of pace.

Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro

  • Reliability ranks highest in its signals, supporting long-term ownership.
  • Huge 1100-liter cargo area suits gear-heavy weekends and travel.
  • Five-seat layout works well for growing families.
  • V6 with 270 hp and 370 Nm provides confident everyday pace (7.5 s 0–100 km/h).

Verdict

Pick Mercedes-Benz E 300 if…
Best fuel economy
Mercedes-Benz E 300 uses 8.7 L/100km vs 12.3 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro if…
Reliability edge
Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro scores higher on reliability — worth considering for long-term ownership.

Related comparisons