Toyota C-HR GR Sport
Crossover · Hybrid
vs
Mazda CX-70 Hybrid
Crossover · Hybrid
Toyota C-HR GR Sport
Car A
Toyota C-HR GR Sport
The Toyota C-HR GR Sport leans on hybrid efficiency and solid everyday pace, suiting family-compact and city use. It emphasizes low consumption and safety signals while remaining quick enough for confident driving.
5 seatsCrossoverHybrid5-star safety5.4 L/100kmHybrid
Mazda CX-70 Hybrid
Car B
Mazda CX-70 Hybrid
The Mazda CX-70 Hybrid prioritizes efficiency and everyday usefulness, delivering 5.5 combined consumption and a generous 600-liter trunk at a price that represents good value in its segment. With 250 hp and 420 Nm, it offers assured daily performance without excess fuel use.
5 seatsCrossoverHybrid250 hpHybrid
Why compared cross brandsame body typesame powertrainsame seatssimilar price

Usage fit

Family 58 / 45
City 56 / 37
Budget / value 52 / 50
Road trip 47 / 29
Performance 26 / 28
Cargo 27 / 40
Practical 39 / 45
Premium 24 / 9
Winter 34 / 8

Scores out of 100. Blue = Toyota C-HR GR Sport · Orange = Mazda CX-70 Hybrid

Specs side-by-side

Spec Toyota C-HR GR Sport Mazda CX-70 Hybrid
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Toyota C-HR GR Sport

  • Hybrid returns 5.4 L/100 km, efficient for city and family duties
  • Brisk 0–100 km/h in 8.0 s for confident overtakes
  • Seats 5 with a 377 L trunk for everyday practicality
  • At 29,500, it offers good value in its segment

Mazda CX-70 Hybrid

  • Efficient for its class at 5.5 combined consumption
  • Strong 420 Nm torque for confident overtakes
  • 600 L cargo space suits growing families
  • Price of 35,000 is good value in its segment

Verdict

Pick Toyota C-HR GR Sport if…
Best fuel economy
Toyota C-HR GR Sport uses 5.4 L/100km vs 5.5 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Mazda CX-70 Hybrid if…
More power
Mazda CX-70 Hybrid puts out 250 hp vs 184 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons