Mazda CX-60 Diesel vs Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro — full comparison

Mazda CX-60 Diesel

Suv · Diesel

vs

Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro

Suv · Gasoline

Mazda CX-60 Diesel

Car A

Mazda CX-60 Diesel

The Mazda CX-60 Diesel blends efficient-for-its-class running costs with strong torque and generous cargo space, making it a solid fit for growing families. It favors everyday practicality over premium flash or outright sportiness.

5 seatsSuvDiesel7.5 L/100km

Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro

Car B

Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro

The Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro leans into reliability and space, making it well suited to growing families and road trips. Strong cargo capacity and a steady V6 outshine its thirst and limited appeal for city or performance driving.

5 seatsSuvGasoline5-star safety270 hp

Why compared same body typesame seatssame usage profilesimilar pricestrong usage match

Usage fit

Family 46 / 88

City 45 / 24

Budget / value 41 / 50

Road trip 35 / 78

Performance 28 / 27

Cargo 40 / 70

Practical 42 / 59

Premium 20 / 37

Winter 24 / 40

Scores out of 100. Blue = Mazda CX-60 Diesel · Orange = Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro

Specs side-by-side

Spec Mazda CX-60 Diesel Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro

Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Mazda CX-60 Diesel

Efficient for its class at 7.5 L/100 km, especially on longer drives
Large 570 L trunk and five seats suit family gear and daily errands
Strong 450 Nm torque for relaxed driving when fully loaded
Good value in its segment given its space and 200 hp performance
Diesel may be less efficient on short, stop‑start city trips
Those seeking premium-badge appeal may prefer established luxury rivals
Capable but not aimed at enthusiasts who want very quick acceleration
Safety and reliability ratings are not provided here, so verify independently

Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro

Reliability ranks highest in its signals, supporting long-term ownership.
Huge 1100-liter cargo area suits gear-heavy weekends and travel.
Five-seat layout works well for growing families.
V6 with 270 hp and 370 Nm provides confident everyday pace (7.5 s 0–100 km/h).
Combined consumption of 12.3 is on the high side.
City driving is a weak use case in the model’s signals.
Not aimed at performance driving; acceleration and top speed won’t thrill enthusiasts.
Price around 49,995 may sit above some buyers’ targets.

Verdict

Pick Mazda CX-60 Diesel if…

Best fuel economy

Mazda CX-60 Diesel uses 7.5 L/100km vs 12.3 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.

Pick Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro if…

More power

Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro puts out 270 hp vs 200 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons