Mazda CX-60 3.3 D
Suv · Diesel
vs
Toyota RAV4 TRD Off-Road
Suv · Gasoline
Mazda CX-60 3.3 D
Car A
Mazda CX-60 3.3 D
The Mazda CX-60 3.3 D balances torque-rich performance, family-ready space, and a 5-star safety rating while staying efficient for its class. It’s a good value in its segment if you prioritize economy and practicality over outright speed.
5 seatsSuvDiesel5-star safety6.1 L/100km272 hp
Toyota RAV4 TRD Off-Road
Car B
Toyota RAV4 TRD Off-Road
The Toyota RAV4 TRD Off-Road balances family practicality with strong cargo capacity and dependable, no-drama performance. It suits growing families and frequent road trips more than shoppers chasing premium features or speed.
5 seatsSuvGasoline5-star safety
Why compared same body typesame seatssame usage profilestrong usage match

Usage fit

Family 66 / 88
City 48 / 45
Budget / value 43 / 61
Road trip 57 / 63
Performance 33 / 27
Cargo 40 / 69
Practical 44 / 63
Premium 30 / 26
Winter 36 / 36

Scores out of 100. Blue = Mazda CX-60 3.3 D · Orange = Toyota RAV4 TRD Off-Road

Specs side-by-side

Spec Mazda CX-60 3.3 D Toyota RAV4 TRD Off-Road
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Mazda CX-60 3.3 D

  • Efficient for its class at 6.1 L/100km
  • Strong 600 Nm torque and 272 hp for confident passing
  • 570 L cargo space suits growing families and road trips
  • 5-star safety rating

Toyota RAV4 TRD Off-Road

  • Roomy cargo area (1085 liters) supports gear-heavy routines and trips
  • Seats 5 comfortably for growing families
  • Good value in its segment at around $36,500
  • Strong focus on reliability and safety

Verdict

Pick Mazda CX-60 3.3 D if…
Best fuel economy
Mazda CX-60 3.3 D uses 6.1 L/100km vs 8.4 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Toyota RAV4 TRD Off-Road if…
Performance & capability
Toyota RAV4 TRD Off-Road is the choice if you want more power, speed, or all-weather capability.

Related comparisons