Mazda CX-60 3.3 D vs Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro

Mazda CX-60 3.3 D

Suv · Diesel

Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro

Suv · Gasoline

Car A

Mazda CX-60 3.3 D

The Mazda CX-60 3.3 D balances torque-rich performance, family-ready space, and a 5-star safety rating while staying efficient for its class. It’s a good value in its segment if you prioritize economy and practicality over outright speed.

5 seatsSuvDiesel5-star safety6.1 L/100km272 hp

Car B

Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro

The Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro leans into reliability and space, making it well suited to growing families and road trips. Strong cargo capacity and a steady V6 outshine its thirst and limited appeal for city or performance driving.

5 seatsSuvGasoline5-star safety

Why compared same body typesame seatssame usage profilesimilar pricestrong usage match

Usage fit

Family 66 / 88

City 48 / 24

Budget / value 43 / 50

Road trip 57 / 78

Performance 33 / 27

Cargo 40 / 70

Practical 44 / 59

Premium 30 / 37

Winter 36 / 40

Scores out of 100. Blue = Mazda CX-60 3.3 D · Orange = Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro

Specs side-by-side

Spec Mazda CX-60 3.3 D Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro

Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Mazda CX-60 3.3 D

Efficient for its class at 6.1 L/100km
Strong 600 Nm torque and 272 hp for confident passing
570 L cargo space suits growing families and road trips
5-star safety rating
0–100 km/h in 8.5 s won’t satisfy performance-focused drivers
Seats five only, limiting flexibility for larger families
Diesel powertrain may not suit buyers preferring petrol or hybrid
At 45,000, some will compare against entry-level premium options

Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro

Reliability ranks highest in its signals, supporting long-term ownership.
Huge 1100-liter cargo area suits gear-heavy weekends and travel.
Five-seat layout works well for growing families.
V6 with 270 hp and 370 Nm provides confident everyday pace (7.5 s 0–100 km/h).
Combined consumption of 12.3 is on the high side.
City driving is a weak use case in the model’s signals.
Not aimed at performance driving; acceleration and top speed won’t thrill enthusiasts.
Price around 49,995 may sit above some buyers’ targets.

Verdict

Pick Mazda CX-60 3.3 D if…

Best fuel economy

Mazda CX-60 3.3 D uses 6.1 L/100km vs 12.3 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.

Pick Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro if…

Performance & capability

Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro is the choice if you want more power, speed, or all-weather capability.

Usage fit

Specs side-by-side

Pros & cons

Mazda CX-60 3.3 D

Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro

Verdict

Related comparisons