Mazda CX-60 2.5 AWD vs Toyota RAV4 TRD Off-Road

Mazda CX-60 2.5 AWD

Suv · Gasoline · AWD

Toyota RAV4 TRD Off-Road

Suv · Gasoline

Car A

Mazda CX-60 2.5 AWD

The Mazda CX-60 2.5 AWD delivers efficient-for-its-class running, strong safety, and family-ready space with all-weather traction. It’s a good value in its segment for growing families and road trips, provided you’re not chasing a premium badge or sports-car pace.

5 seatsSuvGasoline5-star safety7.1 L/100kmAWD

Car B

Toyota RAV4 TRD Off-Road

The Toyota RAV4 TRD Off-Road balances family practicality with strong cargo capacity and dependable, no-drama performance. It suits growing families and frequent road trips more than shoppers chasing premium features or speed.

5 seatsSuvGasoline5-star safety203 hp

Why compared same body typesame powertrainsame seatssame usage profilestrong usage match

Usage fit

Family 66 / 88

City 46 / 45

Budget / value 42 / 61

Road trip 63 / 63

Performance 36 / 27

Cargo 40 / 69

Practical 43 / 63

Premium 28 / 26

Winter 76 / 36

Scores out of 100. Blue = Mazda CX-60 2.5 AWD · Orange = Toyota RAV4 TRD Off-Road

Specs side-by-side

Spec Mazda CX-60 2.5 AWD Toyota RAV4 TRD Off-Road

Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Mazda CX-60 2.5 AWD

Efficient for its class (7.1 combined consumption)
5-star safety rating for added peace of mind
AWD traction for confident year-round driving
570 L trunk and five seats suit family and road-trip use
Not aimed at performance driving (0–100 km/h in 8.3 s)
Petrol-only powertrain won’t suit buyers seeking electrified options
Price around 45,000 may exceed tighter family budgets
If you prioritize a premium-brand image, this isn’t the focus

Toyota RAV4 TRD Off-Road

Roomy cargo area (1085 liters) supports gear-heavy routines and trips
Seats 5 comfortably for growing families
Good value in its segment at around $36,500
Strong focus on reliability and safety
Not aimed at performance driving (0–100 km/h in 8.4s)
Combined consumption of 8.4 may not satisfy efficiency-first shoppers
Lacks a premium-luxury emphasis
Five seats only; no third-row option

Verdict

Pick Mazda CX-60 2.5 AWD if…

Best fuel economy

Mazda CX-60 2.5 AWD uses 7.1 L/100km vs 8.4 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.

Pick Toyota RAV4 TRD Off-Road if…

More power

Toyota RAV4 TRD Off-Road puts out 203 hp vs 200 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Usage fit

Specs side-by-side

Pros & cons

Mazda CX-60 2.5 AWD

Toyota RAV4 TRD Off-Road

Verdict

Related comparisons