Mazda CX-60 2.5 AWD vs Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro

Mazda CX-60 2.5 AWD

Suv · Gasoline · AWD

Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro

Suv · Gasoline

Car A

Mazda CX-60 2.5 AWD

The Mazda CX-60 2.5 AWD delivers efficient-for-its-class running, strong safety, and family-ready space with all-weather traction. It’s a good value in its segment for growing families and road trips, provided you’re not chasing a premium badge or sports-car pace.

5 seatsSuvGasoline5-star safety7.1 L/100kmAWD

Car B

Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro

The Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro leans into reliability and space, making it well suited to growing families and road trips. Strong cargo capacity and a steady V6 outshine its thirst and limited appeal for city or performance driving.

5 seatsSuvGasoline5-star safety270 hp

Why compared same body typesame powertrainsame seatssame usage profilesimilar pricestrong usage match

Usage fit

Family 66 / 88

City 46 / 24

Budget / value 42 / 50

Road trip 63 / 78

Performance 36 / 27

Cargo 40 / 70

Practical 43 / 59

Premium 28 / 37

Winter 76 / 40

Scores out of 100. Blue = Mazda CX-60 2.5 AWD · Orange = Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro

Specs side-by-side

Spec Mazda CX-60 2.5 AWD Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro

Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Mazda CX-60 2.5 AWD

Efficient for its class (7.1 combined consumption)
5-star safety rating for added peace of mind
AWD traction for confident year-round driving
570 L trunk and five seats suit family and road-trip use
Not aimed at performance driving (0–100 km/h in 8.3 s)
Petrol-only powertrain won’t suit buyers seeking electrified options
Price around 45,000 may exceed tighter family budgets
If you prioritize a premium-brand image, this isn’t the focus

Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro

Reliability ranks highest in its signals, supporting long-term ownership.
Huge 1100-liter cargo area suits gear-heavy weekends and travel.
Five-seat layout works well for growing families.
V6 with 270 hp and 370 Nm provides confident everyday pace (7.5 s 0–100 km/h).
Combined consumption of 12.3 is on the high side.
City driving is a weak use case in the model’s signals.
Not aimed at performance driving; acceleration and top speed won’t thrill enthusiasts.
Price around 49,995 may sit above some buyers’ targets.

Verdict

Pick Mazda CX-60 2.5 AWD if…

Best fuel economy

Mazda CX-60 2.5 AWD uses 7.1 L/100km vs 12.3 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.

Pick Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro if…

More power

Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro puts out 270 hp vs 200 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Usage fit

Specs side-by-side

Pros & cons

Mazda CX-60 2.5 AWD

Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro

Verdict

Related comparisons