Mazda CX-60 2.5 vs Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro

Mazda CX-60 2.5

Suv · Gasoline

Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro

Suv · Gasoline

Car A

Mazda CX-60 2.5

The Mazda CX-60 2.5 is an efficient-for-its-class, family-focused SUV that pairs a combined consumption of 7 with a 5-star safety rating and a useful 570-liter trunk. With 194 hp and 0–100 km/h in 8.5 s, it offers balanced everyday performance at good value in its segment.

5 seatsSuvGasoline5-star safety7 L/100km

Car B

Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro

The Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro leans into reliability and space, making it well suited to growing families and road trips. Strong cargo capacity and a steady V6 outshine its thirst and limited appeal for city or performance driving.

5 seatsSuvGasoline5-star safety270 hp

Why compared same body typesame powertrainsame seatssame usage profilesimilar pricestrong usage match

Usage fit

Family 66 / 88

City 46 / 24

Budget / value 43 / 50

Road trip 58 / 78

Performance 29 / 27

Cargo 40 / 70

Practical 43 / 59

Premium 28 / 37

Winter 36 / 40

Scores out of 100. Blue = Mazda CX-60 2.5 · Orange = Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro

Specs side-by-side

Spec Mazda CX-60 2.5 Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro

Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Mazda CX-60 2.5

Efficient for its class (combined consumption 7).
5-star safety rating.
570-liter trunk suits growing families and road trips.
Good value in its segment at 43,000.
Not aimed at performance driving; 0–100 km/h in 8.5 s is modest for enthusiasts.
Less focused on premium-luxury positioning.
Seats 5 only; no extra-row flexibility for larger families.
Petrol powertrain won’t suit buyers chasing ultra-low fuel bills.

Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro

Reliability ranks highest in its signals, supporting long-term ownership.
Huge 1100-liter cargo area suits gear-heavy weekends and travel.
Five-seat layout works well for growing families.
V6 with 270 hp and 370 Nm provides confident everyday pace (7.5 s 0–100 km/h).
Combined consumption of 12.3 is on the high side.
City driving is a weak use case in the model’s signals.
Not aimed at performance driving; acceleration and top speed won’t thrill enthusiasts.
Price around 49,995 may sit above some buyers’ targets.

Verdict

Pick Mazda CX-60 2.5 if…

Best fuel economy

Mazda CX-60 2.5 uses 7.0 L/100km vs 12.3 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.

Pick Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro if…

More power

Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro puts out 270 hp vs 194 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Usage fit

Specs side-by-side

Pros & cons

Mazda CX-60 2.5

Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro

Verdict

Related comparisons