Mazda CX-5 Signature
Suv · Gasoline
vs
Toyota Land Cruiser FJ
Suv · Gasoline
Mazda CX-5 Signature
Car A
Mazda CX-5 Signature
The Mazda CX-5 Signature balances family practicality with reassuring safety and reliability. Strong cargo space and measured performance make it good value in its segment.
5 seatsSuvGasoline5-star safety8.5 L/100km
Toyota Land Cruiser FJ
Car B
Toyota Land Cruiser FJ
The Toyota Land Cruiser FJ suits growing families and road trips with five seats and a generous 690 L cargo area. Strong gasoline power and a focus on reliability and safety offset a high price and 12 L/100 km fuel use.
5 seatsSuvGasoline5-star safety302 hp
Why compared same body typesame powertrainsame ranking profilesame seatssame usage profilestrong ranking match

Usage fit

Family 87 / 81
City 45 / 19
Budget / value 61 / 34
Road trip 63 / 72
Performance 29 / 32
Cargo 57 / 46
Practical 63 / 55
Premium 26 / 47
Winter 36 / 40

Scores out of 100. Blue = Mazda CX-5 Signature · Orange = Toyota Land Cruiser FJ

Specs side-by-side

Spec Mazda CX-5 Signature Toyota Land Cruiser FJ
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Mazda CX-5 Signature

  • 5-star safety rating for family peace of mind
  • Reliability score of 82 supports low-hassle ownership
  • 875 L cargo and seating for five suit growing families and road trips
  • Efficient for its class with 8.5 combined consumption

Toyota Land Cruiser FJ

  • Large 690 L cargo space fits family gear for road trips
  • 302 hp and 381 Nm with 0–100 km/h in 8 s aid confident merging and passing
  • Seats five, aligning with needs of growing families
  • Emphasis on reliability and safety rather than outright speed

Verdict

Pick Mazda CX-5 Signature if…
Best fuel economy
Mazda CX-5 Signature uses 8.5 L/100km vs 12.0 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Toyota Land Cruiser FJ if…
More power
Toyota Land Cruiser FJ puts out 302 hp vs 195 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons