Mazda CX-5 2.0L
Crossover · Gasoline
vs
Toyota RAV4 Adventure
Crossover · Gasoline
Mazda CX-5 2.0L
Car A
Mazda CX-5 2.0L
A well-rounded family SUV that emphasizes reliability and safety while staying efficient for its class. Offers good value in its segment with usable performance and a practical 506 L trunk.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety6.9 L/100km
Toyota RAV4 Adventure
Car B
Toyota RAV4 Adventure
The Toyota RAV4 Adventure blends family practicality and reliability with ample cargo space and straightforward gasoline performance. It suits growing families and frequent road trips more than premium or performance-focused buyers.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety203 hp
Why compared same body typesame powertrainsame ranking profilesame seatssame usage profilestrong ranking match

Usage fit

Family 73 / 85
City 55 / 50
Budget / value 70 / 61
Road trip 54 / 62
Performance 26 / 27
Cargo 35 / 68
Practical 56 / 61
Premium 23 / 26
Winter 34 / 34

Scores out of 100. Blue = Mazda CX-5 2.0L · Orange = Toyota RAV4 Adventure

Specs side-by-side

Spec Mazda CX-5 2.0L Toyota RAV4 Adventure
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Mazda CX-5 2.0L

  • High reliability score (85) with 5-star safety
  • Efficient for its class at 6.9 L/100 km
  • Good value in its segment around 26,000
  • Practical 506 L trunk and 5-seat layout for growing families

Toyota RAV4 Adventure

  • Strong emphasis on reliability for low-hassle ownership
  • Generous 1080 L cargo area for strollers, sports gear, and luggage
  • Five seats with adequate power (203 hp, 0–100 km/h in 8.0 s) for daily use
  • Around 35,000, offering good value in its segment

Verdict

Pick Mazda CX-5 2.0L if…
Best fuel economy
Mazda CX-5 2.0L uses 6.9 L/100km vs 8.7 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Toyota RAV4 Adventure if…
More power
Toyota RAV4 Adventure puts out 203 hp vs 165 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons