Mazda CX-30 vs Toyota C-HR XLE Premium

Mazda CX-30

Crossover · Gasoline

Toyota C-HR XLE Premium

Crossover · Gasoline

Car A

Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 delivers good value in its segment by balancing efficiency, usable performance, and top safety. It suits compact-family and city use, backed by a reliability score of 85 and five safety stars.

5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety6.5 L/100km186 hp

Car B

Toyota C-HR XLE Premium

The Toyota C-HR XLE Premium leans toward reliability, safety, and everyday usefulness for growing families at a sensible price point. It offers ample space and calm driving manners, but performance and premium feel take a back seat.

5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety

Why compared more reliablebetter valuecomparison pickalternative pickcross brandsame body type

Usage fit

Family 71 / 75

City 56 / 52

Budget / value 72 / 65

Road trip 50 / 52

Performance 28 / 26

Cargo 31 / 40

Practical 54 / 55

Premium 22 / 22

Winter 34 / 34

Scores out of 100. Blue = Mazda CX-30 · Orange = Toyota C-HR XLE Premium

Specs side-by-side

Spec Mazda CX-30 Toyota C-HR XLE Premium

Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Mazda CX-30

Five-star safety and an 85 reliability score for peace of mind
Efficient for its class at 6.5 combined consumption
Lively daily performance: 186 hp and 0–100 km/h in 8.5 s
Practical compact-family fit with 430 L trunk and 5 seats
Not aimed at performance driving; 200 km/h top speed won’t thrill enthusiasts
Lacks premium positioning if you want an upscale badge
430 L cargo and 5 seats may be tight versus larger SUVs
8.5 s to 100 km/h is capable, but not class-leading

Toyota C-HR XLE Premium

Emphasis on reliability and safety aligns with family priorities
Roomy cargo area handles strollers, groceries, and weekend gear
Five-seat practicality fits a growing household
Good value in its segment at this price point
Modest performance: 114 hp and 0–100 km/h in 10 s
Combined consumption of 8.1 is average rather than standout
Not a premium experience for shoppers seeking an upscale feel
Only five seats; no third-row option for larger families

Verdict

Pick Mazda CX-30 if…

Best fuel economy

Mazda CX-30 uses 6.5 L/100km vs 8.1 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.

Pick Toyota C-HR XLE Premium if…

Reliability edge

Toyota C-HR XLE Premium scores higher on reliability — worth considering for long-term ownership.

Usage fit

Specs side-by-side

Pros & cons

Mazda CX-30

Toyota C-HR XLE Premium

Verdict

Related comparisons