Mazda CX-3 Touring
Crossover · Gasoline
vs
Toyota Corolla Cross
Crossover · Gasoline
Mazda CX-3 Touring
Car A
Mazda CX-3 Touring
The Mazda CX-3 Touring offers good value in its segment for city driving, combining a 5-star safety rating and an 85 reliability score with efficient 6.1 combined consumption. Its 264 L trunk and 150 hp are modest, making it less ideal for cargo-heavy use or performance-focused buyers.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety6.1 L/100km
Toyota Corolla Cross
Car B
Toyota Corolla Cross
A sensible five-seat family car that leans on reliability and safety while keeping costs in check. Useful cargo space and efficient gasoline running make it a strong fit for growing families and daily commuting.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety171 hp
Why compared alternative pickcross brandsame body typesame powertrainsame ranking profilesame seats

Usage fit

Family 65 / 72
City 69 / 55
Budget / value 73 / 71
Road trip 36 / 50
Performance 24 / 27
Cargo 21 / 34
Practical 51 / 56
Premium 16 / 23
Winter 28 / 34

Scores out of 100. Blue = Mazda CX-3 Touring · Orange = Toyota Corolla Cross

Specs side-by-side

Spec Mazda CX-3 Touring Toyota Corolla Cross
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Mazda CX-3 Touring

  • 5-star safety rating
  • Reliability score of 85
  • Efficient for its class (6.1 combined consumption)
  • Good value in its segment at a listed price of 22000

Toyota Corolla Cross

  • Prioritizes reliability and safety for family duty
  • Good value in its segment around $25,000
  • Efficient for its class at 6.5 L/100 km, easing fuel costs
  • Five seats and a 487 L trunk handle school runs and weekend hauls

Verdict

Pick Mazda CX-3 Touring if…
Best fuel economy
Mazda CX-3 Touring uses 6.1 L/100km vs 6.5 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Toyota Corolla Cross if…
More power
Toyota Corolla Cross puts out 171 hp vs 150 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons