Toyota C-HR Hybrid
Crossover · Hybrid
vs
Mazda CX-3 Touring
Crossover · Gasoline
Toyota C-HR Hybrid
Car A
Toyota C-HR Hybrid
The Toyota C-HR Hybrid focuses on efficiency and practicality, returning 4.0 L/100 km and up to 1,000 km of range. It seats five with a 377 L trunk and offers good value in its segment, though it favors frugality over thrills.
5 seatsCrossoverHybrid5-star safety4 L/100kmHybrid
Mazda CX-3 Touring
Car B
Mazda CX-3 Touring
The Mazda CX-3 Touring offers good value in its segment for city driving, combining a 5-star safety rating and an 85 reliability score with efficient 6.1 combined consumption. Its 264 L trunk and 150 hp are modest, making it less ideal for cargo-heavy use or performance-focused buyers.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety150 hp
Why compared same body typesame seatssame usage profilesimilar pricestrong usage match

Usage fit

Family 68 / 65
City 60 / 69
Budget / value 73 / 73
Road trip 62 / 36
Performance 22 / 24
Cargo 27 / 21
Practical 55 / 51
Premium 22 / 16
Winter 34 / 28

Scores out of 100. Blue = Toyota C-HR Hybrid · Orange = Mazda CX-3 Touring

Specs side-by-side

Spec Toyota C-HR Hybrid Mazda CX-3 Touring
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Toyota C-HR Hybrid

  • 4.0 L/100 km combined helps keep running costs down.
  • Approx. 1,000 km range reduces fuel stops for commuting and road trips.
  • Five seats and a 377 L trunk fit compact-family needs.
  • Around 25,000 price point offers good value in its segment.

Mazda CX-3 Touring

  • 5-star safety rating
  • Reliability score of 85
  • Efficient for its class (6.1 combined consumption)
  • Good value in its segment at a listed price of 22000

Verdict

Pick Toyota C-HR Hybrid if…
Best fuel economy
Toyota C-HR Hybrid uses 4.0 L/100km vs 6.1 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Mazda CX-3 Touring if…
More power
Mazda CX-3 Touring puts out 150 hp vs 122 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons