Mazda CX-3 Sport
Crossover · Gasoline
vs
Toyota C-HR XLE Premium
Crossover · Gasoline
Mazda CX-3 Sport
Car A
Mazda CX-3 Sport
The Mazda CX-3 Sport delivers good value in its segment with 5-star safety, solid reliability, and city-friendly manners. It’s efficient for its class and quick enough for daily driving, though cargo space is limited.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety6.9 L/100km148 hp
Toyota C-HR XLE Premium
Car B
Toyota C-HR XLE Premium
The Toyota C-HR XLE Premium leans toward reliability, safety, and everyday usefulness for growing families at a sensible price point. It offers ample space and calm driving manners, but performance and premium feel take a back seat.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety
Why compared more reliablecomparison picksame body typesame powertrainsame seatsstep-up price

Usage fit

Family 64 / 75
City 67 / 52
Budget / value 70 / 65
Road trip 36 / 52
Performance 23 / 26
Cargo 21 / 40
Practical 48 / 55
Premium 15 / 22
Winter 28 / 34

Scores out of 100. Blue = Mazda CX-3 Sport · Orange = Toyota C-HR XLE Premium

Specs side-by-side

Spec Mazda CX-3 Sport Toyota C-HR XLE Premium
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Mazda CX-3 Sport

  • 5-star safety rating
  • Good value in its segment at 21000
  • Efficient for its class (6.9 combined consumption)
  • Reliability score of 80

Toyota C-HR XLE Premium

  • Emphasis on reliability and safety aligns with family priorities
  • Roomy cargo area handles strollers, groceries, and weekend gear
  • Five-seat practicality fits a growing household
  • Good value in its segment at this price point

Verdict

Pick Mazda CX-3 Sport if…
Best fuel economy
Mazda CX-3 Sport uses 6.9 L/100km vs 8.1 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Toyota C-HR XLE Premium if…
Reliability edge
Toyota C-HR XLE Premium scores higher on reliability — worth considering for long-term ownership.

Related comparisons