Toyota RAV4 Adventure
Crossover · Gasoline
vs
Mazda CX-3 Grand Touring
Crossover · Gasoline
Toyota RAV4 Adventure
Car A
Toyota RAV4 Adventure
The Toyota RAV4 Adventure blends family practicality and reliability with ample cargo space and straightforward gasoline performance. It suits growing families and frequent road trips more than premium or performance-focused buyers.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety203 hp
Mazda CX-3 Grand Touring
Car B
Mazda CX-3 Grand Touring
The Mazda CX-3 Grand Touring balances strong safety and reliability with city-friendly efficiency at a price that offers good value in its segment. Its compact practicality favors everyday urban use over cargo-heavy or high-performance needs.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety6.8 L/100km
Why compared same body typesame powertrainsame ranking profilesame seatsstrong ranking match

Usage fit

Family 85 / 65
City 50 / 67
Budget / value 61 / 70
Road trip 62 / 36
Performance 27 / 26
Cargo 68 / 21
Practical 61 / 50
Premium 26 / 16
Winter 34 / 28

Scores out of 100. Blue = Toyota RAV4 Adventure · Orange = Mazda CX-3 Grand Touring

Specs side-by-side

Spec Toyota RAV4 Adventure Mazda CX-3 Grand Touring
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Toyota RAV4 Adventure

  • Strong emphasis on reliability for low-hassle ownership
  • Generous 1080 L cargo area for strollers, sports gear, and luggage
  • Five seats with adequate power (203 hp, 0–100 km/h in 8.0 s) for daily use
  • Around 35,000, offering good value in its segment

Mazda CX-3 Grand Touring

  • 5-star safety rating
  • Reliability score of 85
  • Efficient for its class (6.8 combined)
  • Well-suited to city driving and compact-family use

Verdict

Pick Toyota RAV4 Adventure if…
Efficiency & everyday ease
Toyota RAV4 Adventure is the choice if fuel economy and city-friendly driving are your priority.
Pick Mazda CX-3 Grand Touring if…
Performance & capability
Mazda CX-3 Grand Touring is the choice if you want more power, speed, or all-weather capability.

Related comparisons