Car A
Mazda CX-3
The Mazda CX-3 offers good value in its segment with 5-star safety and efficient running. It suits city and compact-family use if you can live with modest cargo space and power.
Mazda CX-3
Crossover · Gasoline
vs
Toyota RAV4 Hybrid
Crossover · Hybrid
Car B
Toyota RAV4 Hybrid
A practical five-seater hybrid that emphasizes reliability, efficiency, and cargo space. It suits growing families and road-trippers seeking good value in its segment.
Why compared
same body typesame ranking profilesame seatsstrong ranking match
Usage fit
Family
67
/
86
City
68
/
56
Budget / value
71
/
70
Road trip
38
/
72
Performance
22
/
27
Cargo
26
/
68
Practical
51
/
67
Premium
15
/
25
Winter
28
/
34
Scores out of 100. Blue = Mazda CX-3 · Orange = Toyota RAV4 Hybrid
Specs side-by-side
Spec
Mazda CX-3
Toyota RAV4 Hybrid
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.
Pros & cons
Mazda CX-3
- Good value in its segment at a price of 20500
- 5-star safety rating
- Efficient for its class at 6.4 combined consumption
- Solid reliability score (80)
- 350 liters of trunk space is modest for bigger trips
- 121 hp and 180 km/h top speed won’t satisfy performance driving
- Not aimed at a premium experience
- 0–100 km/h in 8.2 s is more adequate than exciting
Toyota RAV4 Hybrid
- Prioritizes reliability and safety for family use
- Generous 1080 L cargo area for strollers, luggage, and gear
- Efficient for its class at 5.8 combined with about 600 km range
- Good value in its segment at around 29000
- Not for performance driving; acceleration and top speed are modest
- Five seats only with no third-row option
- More practical than premium in cabin feel and features
- 221 Nm torque may feel limited for quick passing when fully loaded
Verdict
Pick Mazda CX-3 if…
Lower entry price
Mazda CX-3 starts lower, making it the stronger value pick if budget is a priority.
Pick Toyota RAV4 Hybrid if…
More power
Toyota RAV4 Hybrid puts out 218 hp vs 121 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.