Toyota Tundra SR vs Ford F-150

Toyota Tundra SR

Pickup · Gasoline · 4WD

Ford F-150

Pickup · Gasoline · 4WD

Car A

Toyota Tundra SR

The Toyota Tundra SR combines a 381-hp V8, 4WD, and a roomy 1,685-liter cargo area for capability that fits cargo-heavy use and family road trips. Higher fuel use and a weaker fit for city driving are the main trade-offs.

5 seatsPickupGasoline5-star safety12.3 L/100km

Car B

Ford F-150

The Ford F-150 blends strong 4WD performance and a huge 1500-liter cargo area with five-seat versatility, fitting cargo-heavy use and family road trips. Rapid 0–100 km/h in 6.0 s is a plus, though its 12.5 L/100 km consumption is on the high side.

5 seatsPickupGasoline5-star safety450 hp

Why compared more powerbetter valuecomparison picksame body typesame powertrainsame seats

Usage fit

Family 73 / 74

City 22 / 23

Budget / value 54 / 58

Road trip 72 / 72

Performance 30 / 33

Cargo 80 / 80

Practical 45 / 46

Premium 36 / 35

Winter 30 / 30

Scores out of 100. Blue = Toyota Tundra SR · Orange = Ford F-150

Specs side-by-side

Spec Toyota Tundra SR Ford F-150

Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Toyota Tundra SR

Strong V8 power (381 hp, 540 Nm) and 6.4 s 0–100 km/h enable confident passing and hauling.
4WD traction supports year-round work and travel on varied surfaces.
Large 1,685-liter cargo capacity handles tools, gear, and bulky items.
Seats five, making it workable for growing families and road trips.
Combined consumption of 12.3 is not efficient for daily commuting.
Less suited to city driving per its usage profile.
Not aimed at performance driving despite quick acceleration.
Only five seats, so larger families may need more capacity.

Ford F-150

Massive 1500 L cargo space suits work and gear-heavy needs
Reliability ranks as a key strength in its signals
Quick 0–100 km/h in 6.0 s with 450 hp and 600 Nm for confident passing
4WD and five seats add versatility for family travel and mixed use
12.5 L/100 km combined consumption increases running costs
Weaker signal for city driving; not ideal for tight, stop-and-go use
Winter driving capability is not a standout in the signals
If you rarely carry cargo or road-trip, its capability may be more than you need

Verdict

Pick Toyota Tundra SR if…

Best fuel economy

Toyota Tundra SR uses 12.3 L/100km vs 12.5 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.

Pick Ford F-150 if…

More power

Ford F-150 puts out 450 hp vs 381 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Usage fit

Specs side-by-side

Pros & cons

Toyota Tundra SR

Ford F-150

Verdict

Related comparisons