Ford Expedition XLT
Suv · Gasoline
vs
Toyota Land Cruiser 80
Suv · Gasoline
Ford Expedition XLT
Car A
Ford Expedition XLT
With seating for eight and strong power, the Ford Expedition XLT suits large families and long highway trips. Limited cargo space with all seats up and higher fuel use make it less appealing for city routines.
8 seatsSuvGasoline5-star safety12 L/100km400 hp
Toyota Land Cruiser 80
Car B
Toyota Land Cruiser 80
With eight seats, a 680 L trunk, and strong reliability signals, the Land Cruiser 80 suits large families and long trips. The V8 brings easygoing pace, but efficiency and city driving are not its strengths.
8 seatsSuvGasoline3-star safety
Why compared more reliablebetter valuecomparison pickcross brandsame body typesame powertrain

Usage fit

Family 75 / 76
City 24 / 23
Budget / value 47 / 50
Road trip 66 / 64
Performance 30 / 26
Cargo 32 / 53
Practical 48 / 57
Premium 41 / 29
Winter 40 / 32

Scores out of 100. Blue = Ford Expedition XLT · Orange = Toyota Land Cruiser 80

Specs side-by-side

Spec Ford Expedition XLT Toyota Land Cruiser 80
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Ford Expedition XLT

  • Eight seats suit large families and group travel
  • 400 hp and 6.0 s 0–100 km/h aid confident merging and passing
  • Road‑trip oriented, with comfortable passenger capacity and highway pace
  • Prioritizes reliability and safety in its focus

Toyota Land Cruiser 80

  • Seats for eight suit large families
  • 680 L trunk handles family luggage and gear
  • Strong reliability ranking
  • V8 torque and 0–100 km/h in 8 s ease highway travel

Verdict

Pick Ford Expedition XLT if…
Best fuel economy
Ford Expedition XLT uses 12.0 L/100km vs 13.5 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Toyota Land Cruiser 80 if…
Reliability edge
Toyota Land Cruiser 80 scores higher on reliability — worth considering for long-term ownership.

Related comparisons