2013 Chevrolet Malibu
Sedan · Gasoline · FWD
vs
Toyota Camry LE
Sedan · Gasoline · FWD
2013 Chevrolet Malibu
Car A
2013 Chevrolet Malibu
The 2013 Chevrolet Malibu balances everyday usability with reasonable performance and consumption for value‑minded commuters and small families. With FWD, five seats, and a 428 L trunk, it also fits occasional road trips.
5 seatsSedanGasoline5-star safety
Toyota Camry LE
Car B
Toyota Camry LE
The Toyota Camry LE emphasizes everyday usefulness and value, combining 203 hp performance with five seats and a 427-liter trunk for $24,800. Best for cost-conscious drivers who put reliability and safety ahead of premium flair or maximum cargo space.
5 seatsSedanGasoline5-star safety8.1 L/100km203 hp
Why compared more reliablecomparison picksame body typesame powertrainsame ranking profilesame seats

Usage fit

Family 61 / 62
City 50 / 39
Budget / value 66 / 68
Road trip 53 / 59
Performance 32 / 33
Cargo 23 / 23
Practical 41 / 44
Premium 23 / 29
Winter 26 / 30

Scores out of 100. Blue = 2013 Chevrolet Malibu · Orange = Toyota Camry LE

Specs side-by-side

Spec 2013 Chevrolet Malibu Toyota Camry LE
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

2013 Chevrolet Malibu

  • Good value in its segment at a listed price of 23,000.
  • Five seats and a 428 L trunk cover typical family needs.
  • 197 hp with 0–100 km/h in 8.5 s supports confident passing.
  • Combined consumption of 8.5 suits mixed commuting.

Toyota Camry LE

  • Prioritizes reliability and safety for straightforward ownership
  • Competitive $24,800 pricing delivers good value in its segment
  • 203 hp and 0–100 km/h in 8.5 s provide confident daily performance
  • Five seats and a 427‑L trunk suit small families and light road trips

Verdict

Pick 2013 Chevrolet Malibu if…
Lower entry price
2013 Chevrolet Malibu starts lower, making it the stronger value pick if budget is a priority.
Pick Toyota Camry LE if…
Reliability edge
Toyota Camry LE scores higher on reliability — worth considering for long-term ownership.

Related comparisons